What is the safest distance from the 5G cell Structure?

Drag to rearrange sections
Rich Text Content
If you've ever walked through a town and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still cause problems for people.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. safe distance from cell tower for exposure are based on scientific data that show that RF energy can be harmful to human health.


The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one gram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This could result in a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis and cataracts and skin cancer.

Due to the potential for severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, and never exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

If you've ever used a cell phone, then you're aware that the safest range from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is due to the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the further the tower is.

While it sounds like something that's good however, people who live close to towers could be more susceptible to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther distance from them.

But, the study found that people who moved into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a few days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.

This is due to the fact that RF radiation, used for wireless communication, has the ability to penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand since the skin serves as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ in the human body, and is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on a variety of assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).

The assumption is also ignoring the greater penetration of ELF parts of modulated RF signals and the consequences on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. As such they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.

In what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their limit of exposure to the local SARs, based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of radiation exposure. Particularly what is a safe distance from a cell tower is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation and other agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin diseases such as acne.
rich_text    
Drag to rearrange sections
Rich Text Content
rich_text    

Page Comments

No Comments

Add a New Comment:

You must be logged in to make comments on this page.