If you've ever wandered through a town, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could cause issues for users.
It is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
![](https://www.counterpointresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/antenna-blue-sky-cell-tower-94844.jpg)
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data that prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one kilogram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This could result in many possible harms, such as an increase in formation of skin disorders like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, and not exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that a safe range from the tower is around 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the further away you are from it.
Although this may sound like an ideal idea but the truth is that those living close to towers may actually be more susceptible to health issues. For
safe distance to live from cell phone tower , a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that those who lived within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther distance from them.
This study showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is vital to be aware of this because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the largest organ of the human body, and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on numerous assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science.
what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
This assumption does not take into account the greater penetration of ELF parts of modulated RF signals and the effects on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. These assumptions do not correspond with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum limit of exposure to the local SARs based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument to assess the amount of radiation exposure. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This could result in an increased risk of adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.