If you've ever walked through a town, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.

The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data that show that RF energy can be harmful to human health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a gram of tissue.


But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body parts. This can lead to various possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

In the event that you've used cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe location from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is due to the power of the transmission of cell towers increases drastically the further your location from the tower.

While this sounds like a good idea but the truth is that those living close to towers may actually be more prone to health issues. For safe distance to live from cell phone tower , a study from 2014 in India found that those living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those who were distance from them.

This study found that people who moved into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Other studies have demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.

This is because radiofrequency radiation, utilized in wireless communications, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. https://te.legra.ph/What-lengths-Should-I-Remain-From-the-5G-Cell-phone-Tower-04-07 is crucial to know since the skin functions as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. It is also the largest organ in the human body, and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. safe distance to live from cell phone tower include the incorrect belief that exposures to RF radiations are not harmful due to the limited absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).

This also overlooks the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of the modulated RF signal as well as the consequences of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.

In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs, based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.