What is the safest distance from a 5G cell Tower system?

Drag to rearrange sections
Rich Text Content
If you've ever wandered through a town and spotted tiny cell towers for 5G on street light poles. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.

They are replacing the larger built cell towers. While how to block radiation but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
The of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe distance that one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF can cause harm to health.

The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one Gram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This can result in many potential problems, including an increased the development of skin conditions such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.


Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general maximum power density of four MW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, and not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

Have you ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that a safe location from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is because the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the further away your location from the tower.

While this sounds like an ideal idea, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers could be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those who were away from the antennas.

This study found that people who moved to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.

This is because the RF radiation used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. This is important to understand because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. Additionally, https://wren-pettersson.thoughtlanes.net/preventing-electromagnetic-fields-applying-clothes-1679879848 is the biggest organ of the human body and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
how to block magnetic field for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation is safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

This also overlooks the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the effect on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.

Furthermore, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This could result in an increased risk of adverse health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.
rich_text    
Drag to rearrange sections
Rich Text Content
rich_text    

Page Comments

No Comments

Add a New Comment:

You must be logged in to make comments on this page.