If you've ever walked through a town you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.

The smaller ones are being replaced by larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
A FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research that show that RF energy could be harmful to human health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one kilogram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This can lead to many potential problems, including an increased appearance of skin disorders such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general maximum power density of four MW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, and never exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

If you've ever used a cell phone, you probably know that a safe distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the further your location from the tower.

While it sounds like a good idea however, people living in close proximity to towers might be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people who lived within 50m of cell towers had much more health problems than those who were away from the antennas.

But, the study found that people who moved into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a couple of days. https://ctxt.io/2/AACQTvIRFQ has demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.

This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communications, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin acts as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the most important organ in the human body and is accountable for keeping the integrity of other organs.

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. These include the erroneous belief that short-term exposures RF radiation are safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

The assumption also ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals and the effect of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. As such, they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.

In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. how to block radiation from wifi router of RF radiation with other environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health consequences. For example, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.