If you've ever been through a town, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

They are replacing larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
The of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research that show that RF energy can cause harm to health.

The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one kilogram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This can lead to many possible harms, such as an increase in the development of skin conditions such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.


Due to the potential for severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

In the event that you've used cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest location from the tower is around 400 meters. This is because the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the farther you are from it.

While this sounds like something that's good but the truth is that those living close to towers may actually be more prone to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those living further away from the antennas.

But, the study showed that residents who moved to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a few days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.

This is because RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, called the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a shield against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. The skin is the most important organ of the human body. Proteck'd Apparel is accountable for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. This includes the false belief that exposures to RF radiations are not harmful due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals and the effects on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.


In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC limit the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs, based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of radiation exposure. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This would result in an increased risk of negative health effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.