In recent years, it seems that legalized gambling has received much attention. The federal government and local governments in many jurisdictions are concerned that new gambling establishments will cause a negative impact on tourism, increase costs for local and state tax funds, and hinder efforts to increase community development. A lot of officials worry that an increase in gambling could lead to increased the spread of crime and addiction within local communities. Gambling advocates argue that if people have access to gambling opportunities then they will be more likely to have an desire to engage in sports, entertainment film and other forms of physical activity. Legalized gambling is not thought to have a negative impact on the quality life in any specific area.

Alanselves, an economics professor, has a very interesting article that provides the same argument on the negative consequences of gambling that is legalized. Professors Krugman and Freiberg are right to declare that gambling that is legal does not "seem" to be in a relationship with higher or lower unemployment rates. The two economists also correctly assert that there is no direct link between the number of crime and the amount of people who are unemployed. Furthermore, there is no clear evidence that gambling has a negative effect on tourism or the local economy of any city or region. Numerous cities have expressed concern regarding the possibility of gambling in their communities.

Depending on who you ask the arguments against legalized gaming are contingent on the person you inquire. For those who believe that the argument against gambling to be ineffective and are only looking for reasons for why it shouldn't be permitted, there are a number of problems with the argument. One, a person cannot be considered to be a problem gambler in the event that they are incapable of controlling their gambling habits. Although this argument seems reasonable, the problem is when a gambler wins significant amounts of money and continues buying tickets. This group includes many people however there are many others who lose large sums of money due to online poker machines and slot machines over the course of time. They are referred to as "problem gamblers".

It appears that there is no perfect strategy for gamblers who are struggling. While some people are very disciplined in this regard but there are many who are losing multiple times in a single day, week, or month. The issues of gambling addiction don't stop with individuals who lose money at the betting table or at the online slot machine. It also encompasses those who buy lottery tickets, participate in online bingo and buy sports tickets. These are just a few instances of people who are guilty of problem gambling, however, they are not subject to the jurisdiction of the gambling commission since the laws regarding gambling are different in every state.

The argument that states should stop problem gamblers from gambling is valid. Individuals wouldn't be allowed to benefit from online slots and sports betting, bingo, or other games if states were to do. Some worry that if the commission stopped the activities online and on site, then customers are less likely to take advantage of these services and rather choose more straightforward alternatives. If the customers were making the decisions, there may not be any need for the Commission to intervene.

The new revenue model many lawmakers are pushing isn't necessarily a bad thing for customers of casinos online or gaming venues. In fact, some people believe that it's a great idea for the games to continue to grow and flourish. For example, state lawmakers in Nevada have proposed legislation that would permit residents of the state to play blackjack online for free in their computers. The measure has been backed by the Las Vegas Sands Corp. which is the largest gambling corporation in the world. State legislators also have proposed similar bills in other states.

There are many points that people can be in agreement on when it comes to gambling being legal or illegal. One is the fact that tickets can be sold to sports events and concerts. These kinds of events can be more lucrative for owners of gambling establishments because they attract large crowds. Some believe legalizing sports betting will ensure that gambling does not stop growing within the state.

Some argue that online gambling is unlawful and legalization is not necessary since there are so many issues. They claim that gambling should be regulated in the same manner as other industry, particularly those that are dependent on luck or chance. If gambling was legalized, then there is no reason for people to gamble responsibly and there is no incentive for gamblers to gamble their money in a responsible manner and this would result in less revenue for the states that provide the incentives. Many gamblers who have lost their money betting on dogs for years would prefer to play a few games rather than losing everything to a gambling website and internet connection.