Very best safest distance from your 5G cell Structure?

Drag to rearrange sections
Rich Text Content
If you've ever wandered through a city and spotted tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.

They are replacing the larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
A FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data that show that RF energy could be harmful to human health.

The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a gram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body areas. how to block cell tower radiation can lead to many potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a cell phone, you probably know that the safest distance from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is because the power of the transmission of cell towers increases drastically the farther your location from the tower.

While this sounds like an ideal idea, the reality is that those living close to towers might be more susceptible to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those living further far from antennas.

However, this study also showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.

This is because RF radiation, used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer of skin. It is crucial to know since the skin serves as a shield against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. The skin is the largest organ in the human body and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. They include the false belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).


The assumption is also ignoring the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the effect of brief bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. As such, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.

Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their radiation limits for local peak SARs based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of radiation exposure. Particularly it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for how to block cell tower radiation that is exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin diseases such as acne.
rich_text    
Drag to rearrange sections
Rich Text Content
rich_text    

Page Comments

No Comments

Add a New Comment:

You must be logged in to make comments on this page.